In recent months, Toronto residents have witnessed something unusual: main streets temporarily shut down so that large groups of Muslims can gather in public for prayer. Yonge Street itself — the spine of the city — has been closed for this reason. Organizers cite limited mosque space and the overflow crowds during special occasions, but for the average Torontonian stuck in traffic or watching buses idle, it raises eyebrows.
Yes, freedom of religion is a right. But so is freedom of movement. When a public roadway becomes a prayer hall, we need to ask: where’s the balance?
What’s Actually Going On
-
Not daily, but real: These closures aren’t permanent, but they have happened. Yonge Street, Bloor, Dundas — arteries everyone relies on — have been blocked for prayer gatherings.
-
Overflow issue: The explanation is usually simple — not enough room in mosques, so worshippers spill outside.
-
Tied to rallies: Sometimes these prayers occur during political protests or mass demonstrations, blurring the line between religious expression and public activism.
No, it’s not some grand takeover. But it’s also not nothing. It impacts thousands of people every time it happens.
Why This Doesn’t Sit Right
-
Disruption of public order
Roads are built to move people, goods, and emergency vehicles. Closing them down for prayer delays ambulances, buses, and commuters. That’s not trivial. -
Unfair precedent
If one group can close streets for worship, what stops another group from doing the same? Do all faiths get equal treatment? Do secular causes get the same leeway? -
Erosion of secular space
Streets are supposed to be neutral ground. When they turn into prayer halls, many residents feel excluded — even pressured — in a space that belongs to everyone. -
Power or prayer?
Public prayer on this scale isn’t just about spirituality. It’s also a show of strength: we are here, and you can’t ignore us. That’s fine — until it veers into coercion. -
Better alternatives exist
Toronto is full of parks, parking lots, and community halls that could be secured for overflow. Choosing roadways feels less like necessity and more like statement.
The Core Issue: Respect for All
Here’s the thing: no one is saying Muslims (or any other group) shouldn’t practice their faith openly. Religious freedom matters. But in a pluralistic city, it has to be balanced against everyone else’s rights.
When a roadway shuts down for one group’s rituals, the ripple effects touch everyone — believers and non-believers alike. That’s not balance. That’s preference.
What Toronto Needs
-
Permits and rules: If these gatherings are allowed, they should require permits, traffic plans, and strict limits — the same rules any other event would face.
-
Alternative spaces: Parks and parking lots can absorb overflow without hijacking critical roadways.
-
Consistency: If the city bends rules for one group, it must do the same for all others. Otherwise, we’re not dealing with freedom — we’re dealing with favoritism.
Final Word
Toronto is a diverse city, and that diversity is its strength. But strength doesn’t mean shutting down the streets for religious rituals. Public roads are for the public — all of us, equally.
Faith belongs in homes, in places of worship, in public parks, in community halls. But when it starts taking over the arteries of a city, the city has a duty to say: enough.
Respect religion, yes. But respect the public space we all share even more.
No comments:
Post a Comment