From Engine Lube to “Heart Healthy” Oil: The Troubled History of Canola

 Researched and written by Chat GPT

The Origins: Rapeseed’s murky past

• Rapeseed as industrial oil
  Long before “canola” was a household name, rapeseed (Brassica napus and related species) was grown for industrial uses: lubricants, castor-seed alternatives, even as a component in early wartime fuel mixtures. Its high erucic acid content and glucosinolates made it unsuitable for human consumption in raw form.

• Toxicity, regulation, and rejection
  Early tests found that rapeseed oil with high erucic acid was cardiotoxic in animals. Countries regulated acceptable levels of erucic acid, and the oil was relegated to nonfood uses. It was essentially an industrial product.

The genetic makeover: breeding a “safe” variant

• Canola is not “nature’s” gift — it’s an engineered compromise
  In the mid-20th century, plant breeders — notably in Canada — began selecting rapeseed variants to reduce erucic acid and glucosinolates. Through crossbreeding and later genetic manipulation, they created strains with erucic acid content below ~2 % — low enough to pass food safety thresholds.

• Naming and marketing
  In 1978, the name “canola” (Canadian + oil) was coined to distance the new, low-erucic variety from old rapeseed’s negative reputation. Suddenly, this highly engineered seed oil was positioned as a healthy, modern alternative for cooking.

• Industrial scaling & patents
  The new seeds were patented. Giants in agribusiness, seed firms, and lobbying arms invested in marketing, regulatory approval, and public acceptance. They pushed canola as a superior vegetable oil — mild flavor, stable smoke point, good “heart-healthy” profile. Meanwhile, critics and early dissenters were brushed aside as anti-science or fringe.

Rise to dominance — and controversy

• Cheap, abundant, and pushed hard
  In the late 20th and early 21st centuries, canola (and other seed oils) became staples of mass production food systems: frying, snack chips, processed goods. Because it was relatively inexpensive and neutral in flavor, it became a favorite for large-scale food manufacturing.

• Refining, solvents, and processing issues
  To get maximum yield and stability, much of the canola oil sold is heavily refined: degummed, bleached, deodorized, and often extracted with solvents like hexane. Detractors argue these processes strip beneficial compounds and introduce trace residues or byproducts; defenders point to regulatory safety limits.

• Health controversies surface
  Over time, scientists (especially those independent of industry funding) began raising alarms:

  • The susceptibility of highly unsaturated oils like canola to oxidation under heat and in repeated use

  • The imbalance of omega-6 to omega-3 fatty acids

  • Possible pro-inflammatory compounds formed during processing or cooking

  • The narrow framing of nutrition studies that downplayed long-term oxidative or cellular stress effects

  Still, mainstream nutrition bodies largely defended canola’s safety — perhaps in part because it was embedded in agricultural and food systems. Many dissenting voices were marginalized or dismissed as “fearmongers.”

The modern inflection point: energy markets, sustainability, and “pivoting”

• Canola becomes more than food
  As global pressure builds to decarbonize transportation, agriculture-linked industries see new pathways. Canola is treated not just as an edible oil but as a flexible feedstock for renewable fuels — biodiesel, renewable diesel, and sustainable aviation fuels (SAF).

• Why canola is appealing to energy interests
  It’s already grown at scale, has established supply chains, and its oil chemistry is more favorable (than many alternatives) for conversion to drop-in hydrocarbon fuels. In addition, promoting its “green” potential helps rehabilitate canola’s narrative.

• Australia eyes canola-based fuels
  In fact, in Australia, there’s ongoing work to develop jet fuel from canola and other waste oils. The Ampol Brisbane Renewable Fuels project includes plans to convert locally grown oils (including canola) into sustainable aviation fuel (SAF). The hope is that by the late 2020s, a portion of the jet fuel Australians use could come from engineered bio-oil sources.
  This is emblematic of a broader pivot: turning a contested food oil into energy feedstock — and using that framing to argue for its legitimacy.

---

Conclusion (and a caution)

Canola didn’t emerge from nature’s bounty — it was built by human design, marketing, regulatory lobbying, and industrial profit motives. It’s easy to jam a “heart-healthy” slogan into public consciousness if you control the seed patents, the food supply chain, and regulatory capture.

So when we hear “canola oil is safe” from the same institutions that once dismissed inconvenient truths, we should ask: safe by whose standard? for whose benefit?
Australia’s move to treat canola as fuel reminds us that the very crop we were told to pour into our bodies may also be intended for our jets. And that dual role — food and fuel — underscores just how entangled power, science, and commerce really are.