Researched and Written by ChatGPT
Canada didn’t stumble into a housing crisis by accident. It was engineered through a series of policy decisions that ignored capacity, enforcement, and common sense. One of the least discussed—but most consequential—failures sits in plain sight: tens of thousands of international “students” who entered the country and never attended school.
This isn’t rumor. It’s not social media noise. It’s been acknowledged in parliamentary testimony and questioned publicly by MPs, including Michelle Rempel-Garner, using data from Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada.
The Numbers Canada Doesn’t Want to Talk About
In a recent compliance snapshot, Canadian institutions reported nearly 50,000 international students as “no-shows”—individuals who arrived on study permits but were not found to be enrolled or attending classes as required.
India accounted for the largest number in raw terms. But it was not alone.
Other countries with significant numbers or high rates of non-attendance included:
-
China
-
Nigeria
-
Ghana
And countries with smaller student populations but high non-compliance rates included:
-
Rwanda
-
Democratic Republic of the Congo
-
Jordan
-
Algeria
-
Cameroon
-
Iran
These are not accusations. They are institution-reported compliance figures. The issue is not nationality. The issue is that Canada issued visas, allowed entry, and then lost track of people.
That is a systems failure—period.
Where the Conversation Always Derails
The moment this topic comes up, the accusation follows: racism.
It’s a conversation-killer—and it’s intellectually dishonest.
Discussing visa compliance is not a judgment on race or culture. Immigration systems track data by nationality because that’s how border policy works. Pretending otherwise doesn’t make the problem disappear; it just ensures it continues.
What actually gets lost in the moral panic is the real-world impact.
Housing Is Not an Abstract Concept
Every person who entered Canada under a study permit and didn’t attend school still needed:
-
A room
-
An apartment
-
A basement suite
-
Temporary housing that became permanent
That housing came from a finite supply—the same supply Canadians are told to “be patient” about while rents soar, vacancies vanish, and young people are locked out of home ownership.
This isn’t theoretical. It’s arithmetic.
When enforcement fails, housing pressure increases. When housing pressure increases, prices rise. And when prices rise, Canadians pay—financially and socially.
A Hard Question We Keep Avoiding
If people entered Canada under a program explicitly tied to studying, and they are not studying, then why are they still here under that status?
That’s not cruelty. That’s the rule of law.
No functioning system survives without enforcement. And no country can credibly claim a housing emergency while refusing to review how housing is being allocated in the first place.
What Accountability Could Actually Look Like
This does not require mass blame or collective punishment. It requires basic governance:
-
Mandatory, real-time enrollment verification
-
Automatic review of status for confirmed no-shows
-
Closure of diploma-mill loopholes
-
Temporary housing relief tied to compliance outcomes
-
Prioritization of housing for citizens and legal residents following program rules
None of this is radical. It’s standard practice in countries that still expect immigration programs to mean what they say.
The Uncomfortable Truth
Canada didn’t “run out of compassion.”
It ran out of capacity, oversight, and political courage.
You cannot invite the world in under one set of rules, fail to enforce them, and then act shocked when systems break—especially housing.
Calling that observation “racist” doesn’t make it wrong. It just makes the conversation impossible.
And Canadians are done paying for impossible conversations.
No comments:
Post a Comment