The War on Worship: CBC’s Campaign to Cancel Sean Feucht Exposes Canada's Religious Double Standard

 Written by OpenAI

You don’t have to be Christian to see the obvious.

Sean Feucht—a well-known worship leader and activist—is under targeted attack by Canada’s publicly funded broadcaster, the CBC. Feucht’s Canadian “Kingdom to Canada” tour, which includes worship, music, and public prayer, has been actively undermined by CBC reporters who have contacted venues in an attempt to pressure them into cancelling his shows.

Yes, you read that right: a taxpayer-funded media outlet is working to shut down a religious music tour because they don’t like the message.

Meanwhile, other faiths in Canada are given the green light to close down city streets for mass prayers—like in Toronto and Mississauga, where public Islamic prayer events block intersections with police protection and media applause. These gatherings are routinely celebrated as examples of multiculturalism and inclusion.

So why is Feucht's peaceful worship gathering being treated like a national threat?

Here’s what CBC actually did:

• On July 18, 2024, CBC News published a piece titled "Christian worship leader’s Canadian tour raises concerns over political messaging" (Source)

• In the article, they imply that Feucht’s events are divisive and “linked to far-right messaging,” though they provide no evidence of violence, hate speech, or unlawful activity at his events.

• CBC journalists contacted at least three venues in an apparent effort to raise red flags and question whether they should host the tour.
  
  

Let’s be blunt: This is not journalism. It’s activism.

When CBC reporters call venues and start probing about an artist’s political or religious views, that’s not reporting—it’s intimidation. That’s the behavior of a state-aligned watchdog enforcing ideological conformity.

Feucht is not preaching hate. He’s not inciting riots. He’s gathering people to sing and pray. Even if you don’t share his beliefs, that’s protected expression in any free society—at least, it should be.

And while we’re at it, let’s also point out the massive hypocrisy of those who cheer for “diversity” and “freedom of expression” until someone dares to express an unfashionable faith like Christianity. The same people who march for civil liberties are silent when those liberties are denied to believers who don’t align with their political compass.

This is a problem for all of us—Christian or not.

If public worship can be labeled “extreme,” if peaceful gatherings are subject to cancellation campaigns led by national media, then we are no longer talking about democracy. We are talking about selective authoritarianism.

It’s not about Feucht.
It’s not about music.
It’s about control of the public narrative.

Want the proof? Here's a breakdown:

• CBC’s article calls Feucht’s events “controversial” because he spoke out against pandemic lockdowns and vaccine mandates. That’s his right. So did thousands of doctors, scientists, and civil liberty lawyers.

• No evidence is provided to suggest his concerts are unsafe, unlawful, or inciteful.

• Local politicians parrot the concern-trolling, stating the events might “foster division.” Again, without offering a shred of proof.

The CBC isn't protecting the public. They're protecting an ideological monopoly.

Final Thought:

If you think this is just about Christianity, you’re missing the point. Today it’s Feucht. Tomorrow it’s any gathering the state doesn’t like. Freedom of worship—like freedom of speech—only means something if it applies when it’s inconvenient.