Written and Researched by OpenAi from the internet where everyone and anyone can find this info:
Most Americans don’t even stop to ask: What exactly is the Director of National Intelligence (DNI) supposed to do?
The DNI’s job is to oversee the nation’s 18 intelligence agencies, ensure they work together, and give the President an honest, unbiased picture of threats and realities. In other words, the DNI should be impartial, disciplined, and grounded in truth—not beholden to contractors, politicians, or party machines.
Now, let’s compare the last two people to hold this post.
TL;DR
-
Avril Haines: Lawyer, bureaucrat, insider. Helped justify drone strikes and covered up CIA torture.
-
Tulsi Gabbard: Combat veteran, medic, lieutenant colonel. Saw war firsthand and fought to end regime-change wars.
Quick Comparison: Tulsi vs. Haines
| Category | Tulsi Gabbard | Avril Haines |
|---|---|---|
| Background | Combat medic, two tours (Iraq, Kuwait) | Georgetown lawyer, D.C. bureaucrat |
| Service | Rose to lieutenant colonel in Army Reserve | No military experience |
| Core Values | Anti-regime change, pro-civil liberties | Protected CIA torture program, surveillance ties |
| Ties | Independent voice, small donor backing | Defense contractor think tanks, Palantir links |
| Public Image | Maverick, controversial but authentic | “Steady hand” — establishment gatekeeper |
| Legacy | Put people before party | Enabled drone killings & protected abusers |
The Brutal Truth
Avril Haines may have looked like a calm, capable technocrat, but in practice she functioned as a long-distance enabler of death. She sat in D.C. conference rooms justifying drone strikes, some against American citizens, and redacting torture reports to shield perpetrators. That’s not oversight. That’s complicity.
Tulsi Gabbard may ruffle feathers, but she has skin in the game. She’s been in the mud, patched bleeding soldiers, and seen the cost of war. When she calls for ending regime-change wars, it’s not a talking point—it’s lived experience.
Why It Matters
This isn’t just about Tulsi vs. Haines. It’s about what the role of DNI should be. Do you want an insider who protects institutions from accountability, or someone who’s willing to question the whole machine?
If you want intelligence to serve the people, not the permanent war state, the choice is obvious.
No comments:
Post a Comment